If it's semi-standard, we should probably support it too.

However, a Google search reveals the following other uses of .sls:
  - A list of images for a slideshow ("sls" stands for "slideshow script")
  - The backup files for some program callled Litespeed
  - ScriptLab Scripts (seems to be an image generation program)
  - Configuration files for the Salt infrastructure management tool

So we probably shouldn't use it ourselves. (Plus, I personally think it's
uglier than .scm, but that's not a strong argument.)

Noah



On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> Any objections to adding ".guile.sls" and ".sls" to Guile's default
> %load-extensions?  Ian Price tells me that this naming convention is
> commonly followed for R6RS libraries and implementations, e.g. Racket,
> Mosh, Ikarus, and Ypsilon.  It would facilitate easy use of R6RS
> libraries without having to rename the files.  I'm inclined to go along.
>
> What do you think?
>
>     Mark
>
>
>