From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noah Lavine Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Do you recognize these modules? Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:27:37 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87zk9r8p1s.fsf@gnuvola.org> <8762bz89zg.fsf@gnuvola.org> <87r4unszj2.fsf@gnu.org> <87k40eg0k1.fsf@gnuvola.org> <87mx59kxqw.fsf@pobox.com> <87ehq8od4e.fsf@gnuvola.org> <87wr40s9yk.fsf@pobox.com> <87396onqi0.fsf@gnuvola.org> <87sjcypoet.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1345933670 15623 80.91.229.3 (25 Aug 2012 22:27:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 22:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= , Thien-Thi Nguyen , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 26 00:27:48 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T5OpW-0000L9-3R for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 00:27:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53687 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T5OpU-00086X-1T for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:27:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38908) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T5OpR-00086N-Ej for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:27:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T5OpO-00021E-RS for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:27:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:44407) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T5OpO-000217-GE; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:27:38 -0400 Original-Received: by obhx4 with SMTP id x4so7293025obh.0 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 15:27:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Lt5tX8HsFWaCIBCV8LgPZTp0My3SPOZxhAAU5ieMd28=; b=RSm9ohvpCn9r8hZwG92ZKOc4kWjjfb2OHgFqcUu7qHs2TsHGP8A3O7fu66AwFYEYFU PyGLJszDFvwTtAGMl7SPqdv0aBAIWk42vWUkoWOI8lM+YE4eZkIAooZSdmrVC/B/wRtZ lu8UnVFg90hU1ZJdIAqSgL9NwyhTtZPVtk4GX6a6cwZCOBSmdlv6bGhHdDow3GBtHNBo L7oXd+fQ5gADECY1/bSR18nIhXMQIX4O8AKLWzzPgU36rxFjy8X8tTitjni4Tz1l4FWm Vh7iK8g8BmQIuMbA13+SOBHSgB79BYH24vueBTUiJrwhARCU45LYIRZ7vVH9VRk/NRNO +1yQ== Original-Received: by 10.60.2.131 with SMTP id 3mr6914919oeu.59.1345933657543; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 15:27:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.76.167.197 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 15:27:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: woVoFYbd2uHUUNOp8lKHzPXyXv8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.214.169 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:14811 Archived-At: Any objections if I apply these patches soon? I'd like to get them off of my to do list. Thanks, Noah On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Noah Lavine wrote: > And here is a patch to remove all of the @twerp* comments. But did you > mean that I should remove them in the same patches that import the > documentation? I thought it was easier to do it separately, but I > could probably do it that way too. > > Noah > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Noah Lavine wrote: >> Ooops, I think those errors are because I forgot to commit my changes >> to guile.texi for patches 3 and 4. Here are updated versions. (I >> believe the second patch from earlier should work.) >> >> I will make another patch to clean out the @twerpcommentary lines. >> >> Noah >> >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Andy Wingo wrote: >>> On Wed 11 Jul 2012 05:02, Noah Lavine writes: >>> >>>> I'm sorry to miss 2.0.6 by only a few days, but I have turned this >>>> documentation into some patches. Here they are; I think they are ready >>>> to apply to stable-2.0. >>> >>> Cool. I applied the first one. When applying the rest, I got: >>> >>> /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//lineio.texi:12: Prev reference to nonexistent node `Double-Key Hash Tables' (perhaps incorrect sectioning?). >>> /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//hcons.texi:12: `Eq? Hash Consing' has no Up field (perhaps incorrect sectioning?). >>> /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//gap-buffer.texi:12: Next reference to nonexistent node `Double-Key Hash Tables' (perhaps incorrect sectioning?). >>> /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//guile.texi:375: Menu reference to nonexistent node `Double-Key Hash Tables' (perhaps incorrect sectioning?). >>> /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//hcons.texi:12: warning: unreferenced node `Eq? Hash Consing'. >>> makeinfo: Removing output file `guile.info' due to errors; use --force to preserve. >>> make[4]: *** [guile.info] Error 1 >>> >>> As Thien-Thi suggests, it's probably good to filter out the >>> @twerpcommentary etcetera in your next patches. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Andy >>> -- >>> http://wingolog.org/