Re: Do you recognize these modules?

[Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@gmail.com>]

Any objections if I apply these patches soon? I'd like to get them off
of my to do list.

Thanks,
Noah

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@gmail.com> wrote:
> And here is a patch to remove all of the @twerp* comments. But did you
> mean that I should remove them in the same patches that import the
> documentation? I thought it was easier to do it separately, but I
> could probably do it that way too.
>
> Noah
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ooops, I think those errors are because I forgot to commit my changes
>> to guile.texi for patches 3 and 4. Here are updated versions. (I
>> believe the second patch from earlier should work.)
>>
>> I will make another patch to clean out the @twerpcommentary lines.
>>
>> Noah
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed 11 Jul 2012 05:02, Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> I'm sorry to miss 2.0.6 by only a few days, but I have turned this
>>>> documentation into some patches. Here they are; I think they are ready
>>>> to apply to stable-2.0.
>>>
>>> Cool.  I applied the first one.  When applying the rest, I got:
>>>
>>>     /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//lineio.texi:12: Prev reference to nonexistent node `Double-Key Hash Tables' (perhaps incorrect sectioning?).
>>>     /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//hcons.texi:12: `Eq? Hash Consing' has no Up field (perhaps incorrect sectioning?).
>>>     /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//gap-buffer.texi:12: Next reference to nonexistent node `Double-Key Hash Tables' (perhaps incorrect sectioning?).
>>>     /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//guile.texi:375: Menu reference to nonexistent node `Double-Key Hash Tables' (perhaps incorrect sectioning?).
>>>     /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//hcons.texi:12: warning: unreferenced node `Eq? Hash Consing'.
>>>     makeinfo: Removing output file `guile.info' due to errors; use --force to preserve.
>>>     make[4]: *** [guile.info] Error 1
>>>
>>> As Thien-Thi suggests, it's probably good to filter out the
>>> @twerpcommentary etcetera in your next patches.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Andy
>>> --
>>> http://wingolog.org/