Hello,

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Ian Price <ianprice90@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm loath to add anything to (ice-9 q) since I find the names, and
> the lack of a distinct type, less than satisfactory.
>

Fair enough. I'd be just as happy to implement a new queue container. I
think we need to keep (ice-9 q) around for compatibility, though, so I'm
tempted to say we should go ahead and make it as good as it can be.


> However, if you are going to add them, I'd recommend sticking with the
> q- prefix. So, q-append and q-append!. Keeping the naming consistent
> means one less exception to remember.
>
> Also, I think it might be wise to add a list->q and q->list, with the
> obvious simple implementations
>

You're right. :-)

Noah