From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noah Lavine Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Do you recognize these modules? Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 13:30:32 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87zk9r8p1s.fsf@gnuvola.org> <8762bz89zg.fsf@gnuvola.org> <87r4unszj2.fsf@gnu.org> <87k40eg0k1.fsf@gnuvola.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1337016642 4552 80.91.229.3 (14 May 2012 17:30:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 17:30:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Thien-Thi Nguyen Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 14 19:30:41 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1STz6X-0008SY-Fn for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 19:30:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40928 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STz6W-0004d7-MY for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 13:30:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40963) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STz6T-0004cA-SC for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 13:30:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STz6R-0008VA-6B for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 13:30:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.213.41]:60658) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STz6Q-0008Tt-W0; Mon, 14 May 2012 13:30:35 -0400 Original-Received: by yhr47 with SMTP id 47so5496457yhr.0 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 10:30:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=y7IWCcz8CXqaYk3xx5Ct7KIKpi9fckGX2fb8wAlmw/o=; b=K/FJ5XTyOCGV4n8gY1UQd2tMhZDpz5SXNlj+MdqqzpsbTeP9XtDMV+RGQaqLBbG4lu 09j+inDOgkNXSQ7+VWTyTubk31sEsnn2Lo0lE8tS85Xq4MvAsXAstEE3OKzubgMWrl5x vwiwOnKM75vuKJCUblXt3/OSNXxAHna0ZLWGDuCmlO59y5RtfBikKqJzmMcDa0LcdR+Q tue4AOBSqqyW7FT21TWbIX8ApLinwtR748vWMyPE6Ce872WJ7eX/Tmr00zY0PLZ9bj6i dr246ls+Bhf2kY097WY7q3mqi7PMJ/evdUZWlTJs9UrelhRqlK1f1njAiWO/DNcfhbuf 6KCA== Original-Received: by 10.50.106.228 with SMTP id gx4mr48665igb.7.1337016632488; Mon, 14 May 2012 10:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.42.29.200 with HTTP; Mon, 14 May 2012 10:30:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87k40eg0k1.fsf@gnuvola.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: W-JCRlCbnwx2UBFtO0XVvx7tKZw X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.213.41 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:14422 Archived-At: Hello, > =A0 If Noah is OK to help with the actual transfer of the doc bits, > =A0 then I guess we=92re almost all set. =A0:-) > > 1.4 snarfs comments from .scm files for interpolation in template > files to create the final texinfo, but i'm almost certain you > don't need/want that flow, but would rather have the final > texinfo. =A0Is that correct? That's probably true, but I am curious about how you do this - Guile 1.4 and earlier apparently have a different documentation-snarfing format than Guile 1.6 and later. We just had a conversation about moving away from ours because it doesn't lead to well-written texinfo files, but maybe yours is more flexible. Noah