From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noah Lavine Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 01:06:07 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87pq3l30ff.fsf@gnu.org> <871ug0ddfi.fsf@googlemail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044472270dce9104ce31fb97 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1352613977 25939 80.91.229.3 (11 Nov 2012 06:06:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 06:06:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Mark H. Weaver" , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= , guile-devel To: Ian Price Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 11 07:06:26 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TXQgc-0007Qe-3M for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 07:06:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51065 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXQgS-0000M0-IB for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 01:06:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50336) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXQgN-0000Ko-LD for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 01:06:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXQgK-0003j2-If for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 01:06:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-oa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.219.41]:36188) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TXQgK-0003iw-Dr; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 01:06:08 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id k14so5953365oag.0 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 22:06:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=VBxhvFnJflGK8z88FaPLdSdJDatomQAX5RRsDrCt8UY=; b=1Dqun9WXaIzGRh3roQlsb8vrYYQQuW7qzZOU+HENJpbD/Gc0ZzqOjz4KjXQUIeBYel xLQmnQFHg7v2iKYFH3AcXHPcYZeaYCgNaHGTsYu42dpmNqeshjrGQt0OsLrA7hmCQjta LCyibpgkm6jnboyTWfy36oVsv7lAsn8QXh01/VB9FE4ELIPsdSHPdgqyuRj2LmO8bg1p aVGABQJuX43Q49VWg0cCM6i60nSK5LOxvcYwBL9hyfIkb6qJr7nTLETfRDRv3VZL4o1S 93m4uD8pzGGM35n537l/NA8H2mmohY0gejrg4EbPfHHQH2+ilioQfhA4gwHJkq07wn14 bJRw== Original-Received: by 10.182.3.197 with SMTP id e5mr12170157obe.92.1352613967547; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 22:06:07 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.76.120.236 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 22:06:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <871ug0ddfi.fsf@googlemail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: -MQG_8yQyhsr0IZEIMT9vkQb-r0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.219.41 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:15149 Archived-At: --f46d044472270dce9104ce31fb97 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 SRFI-9 seems to be part of R7RS anyway (assuming there are no sudden last-minute changes), so I'd say we'll definitely want to do something like that soon. Noah On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Ian Price wrote: > > The patch looks fine to me (it had better be, since it is already pushed > :P), however I wonder if it wouldn't be prudent to look to moving > define-record-type into guile proper, and making (use-modules (srfi > srfi-9)) effectively a no-op. > > -- > Ian Price -- shift-reset.com > > "Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is > the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled" > > --f46d044472270dce9104ce31fb97 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable SRFI-9 seems to be part of R7RS anyway (assuming there are no sudden last-m= inute changes), so I'd say we'll definitely want to do something li= ke that soon.

Noah


On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Ian Price = <ianprice90@googlemail.com> wrote:

The patch looks fine to me (it had better be, since it is already pushed :P), however I wonder if it wouldn't be prudent to look to moving
define-record-type into guile proper, and making (use-modules (srfi
srfi-9)) effectively a no-op.

--
Ian Price -- shift-res= et.com

"Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
the opportunity to do it again" - from "The Wizardy Compiled"= ;


--f46d044472270dce9104ce31fb97--