From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noah Lavine Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Do you recognize these modules? Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 11:26:22 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87zk9r8p1s.fsf@gnuvola.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1335972399 29078 80.91.229.3 (2 May 2012 15:26:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 15:26:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Thien-Thi Nguyen Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 02 17:26:37 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SPbRs-0000y0-7x for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 17:26:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43893 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SPbRr-0003UL-Im for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 11:26:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46308) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SPbRj-0003Ty-PP for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 11:26:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SPbRh-0000dS-QD for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 11:26:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:46429) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SPbRh-0000dF-Ht for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 11:26:25 -0400 Original-Received: by wgbds1 with SMTP id ds1so566210wgb.30 for ; Wed, 02 May 2012 08:26:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UG1kCbEIt5peJc8oQCXjmkxeMtWnZxy4hQ4HnrMW1Ww=; b=nWo5WmqT+l7QlWYUduAI0XmRbCs+fbtSqO64XSE5CzX6A6Ai6TT7TucIYzKjOU0DB7 ScwO6tfX727zPu7I+oApd08yI/pYU1wgJAijTNbITUuuBlHQwuxG+O4FqFu7RKsio+nQ dFrbEYNPXuSrPYOsvsI7r1l06pyhdlc3RWI+6BjNsJ28MMZLXmWhCm1/8gtrzCOID4Vc +SUZSNt5rkKXjIVGew991RpMDu8qrhkvM73JwPnS21VAjtafPFQH7rJjKKTdrO7dvkYI GMqGBmLshdyD3vtyKWe7YjlFrQdzXp2nFBofix3Hgpz2hhduHi0NkKVFvBzh5JL/eLIs Xf1w== Original-Received: by 10.50.158.234 with SMTP id wx10mr5421964igb.71.1335972382915; Wed, 02 May 2012 08:26:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.42.29.200 with HTTP; Wed, 2 May 2012 08:26:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zk9r8p1s.fsf@gnuvola.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: fQ5kIUgCCpcO1ny5bPbrJESsBZA X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 74.125.82.49 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:14331 Archived-At: Thanks a lot! I will definitely look at that. Unfortunately, it looks like the changes for these do not have copyright assigned to the FSF, so we can't use them directly. Is that correct? Also, I hope this isn't a sensitive topic, but why is there a semi-friendly fork of Guile 1.4? Are there things that you want to accomplish that Guile 2.0 can't do? Or maybe you want complete compatibility with Guile 1.4 - even so, why fork? Thanks, Noah On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote: > () Noah Lavine > () Tue, 1 May 2012 18:26:28 -0400 > > =A0 Does anyone know anything about these modules? > > Some of these modules are in Guile 1.4.x, and thus documented. > See , specifically > the module index, and the parent dir for source.