And here is a patch to remove all of the @twerp* comments. But did you mean that I should remove them in the same patches that import the documentation? I thought it was easier to do it separately, but I could probably do it that way too. Noah On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Noah Lavine wrote: > Ooops, I think those errors are because I forgot to commit my changes > to guile.texi for patches 3 and 4. Here are updated versions. (I > believe the second patch from earlier should work.) > > I will make another patch to clean out the @twerpcommentary lines. > > Noah > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Andy Wingo wrote: >> On Wed 11 Jul 2012 05:02, Noah Lavine writes: >> >>> I'm sorry to miss 2.0.6 by only a few days, but I have turned this >>> documentation into some patches. Here they are; I think they are ready >>> to apply to stable-2.0. >> >> Cool. I applied the first one. When applying the rest, I got: >> >> /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//lineio.texi:12: Prev reference to nonexistent node `Double-Key Hash Tables' (perhaps incorrect sectioning?). >> /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//hcons.texi:12: `Eq? Hash Consing' has no Up field (perhaps incorrect sectioning?). >> /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//gap-buffer.texi:12: Next reference to nonexistent node `Double-Key Hash Tables' (perhaps incorrect sectioning?). >> /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//guile.texi:375: Menu reference to nonexistent node `Double-Key Hash Tables' (perhaps incorrect sectioning?). >> /home/wingo/src/guile/doc/ref//hcons.texi:12: warning: unreferenced node `Eq? Hash Consing'. >> makeinfo: Removing output file `guile.info' due to errors; use --force to preserve. >> make[4]: *** [guile.info] Error 1 >> >> As Thien-Thi suggests, it's probably good to filter out the >> @twerpcommentary etcetera in your next patches. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Andy >> -- >> http://wingolog.org/