From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noah Lavine Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Compiler Branch Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:52:16 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87wra0c0y5.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1323784362 22617 80.91.229.12 (13 Dec 2011 13:52:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:52:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 13 14:52:37 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RaSma-0007Te-Ei for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:52:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59041 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RaSma-0004aJ-0p for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:52:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55625) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RaSmR-0004Wi-ND for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:52:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RaSmH-0003UL-LY for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:52:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-gy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:61651) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RaSmH-0003U9-C6 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:52:17 -0500 Original-Received: by ghrr13 with SMTP id r13so513695ghr.0 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 05:52:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=f+ZiHhEQs2ns3EmnNuKnDUpvtYrUcMy6SHcyr/nfjYs=; b=mpWHXkPMk9mqUH/Zw9sAQ8nfMyNTTPrEYrMh48ZKjbqd8WaJLzF7GxZvgkQBe/7jT5 HyGW2uQYA6I8Sj0fCJ7OReL5x+/wyKnwRrJmEJrlhdySlBTg9gtvvx1syioXeWhTiOs2 /pWqPodnLFOiZnWkuE5X11R/By8os0ejJhBEE= Original-Received: by 10.50.217.199 with SMTP id pa7mr14154263igc.48.1323784336446; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 05:52:16 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.42.217.6 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 05:52:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87wra0c0y5.fsf@pobox.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: heB5CYo60hyI1SRBuhROAoD8Tb4 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.160.169 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:13053 Archived-At: > Cool. =A0As a quick reaction, I have some doubts about this project. =A0B= ut, > I guess a WIP branch would be a good thing to have, and it would make > the discussion more concrete. Probably so. But if you have time, what are your doubts? I would much rather talk about problems now than after I've implemented something that we'll have to change. Noah