guile 3 desires: guile-3-0, and debugging

guile 3 desires: guile-3-0, and debugging

[Matt Wette]

Here are a couple desires:

1) more cases for cond-expand, in case 3.2 has items 3.0 does not (e.g., srfi-199)

2) better debugging.  
   Maybe I'm not doing it right, but I struggle in this area: I mostly resort to printing.
   For example, add scheme level hook, or command arg, to turn off optimization.

Re: guile 3 desires: guile-3-0, and debugging

[Christopher Allan Webber]

Matt Wette writes:

> Here are a couple desires:
>
> 1) more cases for cond-expand, in case 3.2 has items 3.0 does not (e.g., srfi-199)
>
> 2) better debugging.  
>    Maybe I'm not doing it right, but I struggle in this area: I mostly resort to printing.
>    For example, add scheme level hook, or command arg, to turn off optimization.

You aren't alone... read this thread:

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2017-05/msg00068.html

And Andy's suggestion of what we need to do to make it better:

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2017-05/msg00070.html

Re: guile 3 desires: guile-3-0, and debugging

[Matt Wette]

> On Nov 24, 2017, at 3:42 PM, Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org> wrote:
> 
> Matt Wette writes:
> 
>> Here are a couple desires:
>> 
>> 1) more cases for cond-expand, in case 3.2 has items 3.0 does not (e.g., srfi-199)
>> 
>> 2) better debugging.  
>>   Maybe I'm not doing it right, but I struggle in this area: I mostly resort to printing.
>>   For example, add scheme level hook, or command arg, to turn off optimization.
> 
> You aren't alone... read this thread:
> 
>  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2017-05/msg00068.html
> 
> And Andy's suggestion of what we need to do to make it better:
> 
>  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2017-05/msg00070.html

(set! (@@ (language tree-il optimize) tree-il-default-optimization-options) (lambda () '()))

and maybe this also?

(set! (@@ (language cps optimize) cps-default-optimization-options) (lambda () '()))