From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: CRLF0710 Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Just to mention: Why there's still not any guile-2.0 packages in linux distributions? Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:08:37 +0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303189732 30399 80.91.229.12 (19 Apr 2011 05:08:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 05:08:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Noah Lavine Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 19 07:08:46 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QC3B5-0007QP-4i for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 07:08:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54264 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QC3B4-0002Kr-7S for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 01:08:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51682) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QC3B0-0002Km-VQ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 01:08:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QC3B0-0007Fa-80 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 01:08:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pv0-f169.google.com ([74.125.83.169]:39799) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QC3B0-0007FT-1e for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 01:08:38 -0400 Original-Received: by pvg4 with SMTP id 4so3594887pvg.0 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 22:08:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eyxN5zo4AXIx22mtFIYI/81FNFY7luWwjXhfswUGyUE=; b=bFuqJ4g68cSbokZMkHEopt0gR/mmSP48p/PiQSoSIKgy9dpHjfm5qvMhBSuVavFzbL PFPZ12rTYQipdc1jkCWL4nkwFn2lA5C4fuR6hUh8lzcoWLQjlAN0Q4/gO/ejIXp30kZ3 Gtrle8GhlN6cVsP1fD9GUZqNHs56sekAV2VmE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wWPMPfaSMzP6O7wxzxzZOeYIkI4Aa0KV4bqblNd7eOIzp9lZSgt85FZEJ3FycNTzMG RXwu7C5e+HP4L0ujMTE3jz348q808NZoRFaNWb5Zsv2TiVHsUhm4b56FuDH6RSz2DnAp blBiRSIkkloXwLrzXmgmnmwpHrLaoylqPjnpU= Original-Received: by 10.68.10.134 with SMTP id i6mr8058538pbb.401.1303189717028; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 22:08:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.68.50.38 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 22:08:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 74.125.83.169 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12289 Archived-At: Thanks. I want to deploy guile 2.0 to about ten machines ( of our development team members'). Since they have the same endianness maybe i'll give this a try... But now i worry most about the deployment of our final software. The deployment will be in September. Well, most of the dependencies can be solved using APT and similar tools within ten minutes, with guile alone may takes more than a hour to be compiled on every user machine(if there's still no guile-2.0 package by that time)... Any suggestions? Thanks a lot. 2011/4/19 Noah Lavine : > I don't know about the packaging, but I think the .go files depend on > the endianness of the machine but nothing else. So you should be able > to move them between different little-endian or big-endian machines > (unless I'm wrong). But it seems much safer to me to just compile > things. You shouldn't have to do it more than once unless you develop > Guile. > > Good luck, > Noah > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:15 PM, CRLF0710 wrote: >> Guile 2.0 has been there for some time. Why there's still not any >> guile-2.0 package in linux distributions? >> Did they have trouble packaging it? >> >> By the way, is the .go file portable? Building them(rnrs, ice-9 etc) >> during compiling guile takes so looooong... >> >> Thanks >> >> -- >> CrLF.0710 >> >> > --=20 Wir m=FCssen wissen; wir werden wissen! CrLF.0710