From: Paul Raccuglia <praccugl@haverford.edu>
To: Andreas Rottmann <a.rottmann@gmx.at>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Hi! Interested in GSoC. Feedback on these ideas?
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 09:21:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinRjG0vn77JJSO2H5+Zb1Rbeq7m=A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871v1egx55.fsf@gmx.at>
> Could you be more specific? What exactly in the code base did make you
> think so?
>
> Thanks, Rotty
Hey. Sorry, to be a little clearer:
It looks like Dorodango could provide a great resource to pull from.
From my (very uninformed) cursory glance,I thought it would need some
reworking to get it to work from Guile. Looking at it a bit more, I
realize I probably don't know what I'm talking about. I'll try to look
through the mailing list some more to get a better sense of the issue.
Thanks for the other feedback. Looking into it.
--Paul
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Andreas Rottmann <a.rottmann@gmx.at> wrote:
> Paul Raccuglia <praccugl@haverford.edu> writes:
>
>> Hi! I'm interested in working on guile as part of the Google Summer of Code.
>>
> [...]
>> Currently I am thinking about:
>>
>> - A package manager (in the vein of apt-get)
>> I know this is one that's come up a bit. I was thinking of writing a
>> small web interface to browse packages, an aptitude style command-line
>> method for downloading, verifying the hashes, checking dependencies,
>> and then install the package(s) and an uninstall function as well. I
>> saw the proposal of working with dorodango; I might look at it, but
>> from what I saw of the code base, I thought it would make sense to try
>> to write a GUILE specific package-manager.
>>
> Could you be more specific? What exactly in the code base did make you
> think so?
>
> Thanks, Rotty
> --
> Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-07 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-07 0:40 Hi! Interested in GSoC. Feedback on these ideas? Paul Raccuglia
2011-04-07 3:36 ` nalaginrut
2011-04-07 8:31 ` Mark H Weaver
2011-04-07 13:10 ` Noah Lavine
2011-04-07 14:12 ` nalaginrut
2011-04-07 14:25 ` Problem with GCC as a Scheme compiler: tail calls Mark H Weaver
2011-04-07 14:37 ` Noah Lavine
2011-04-11 22:31 ` Andy Wingo
2011-04-11 23:12 ` Noah Lavine
2011-04-07 10:43 ` Hi! Interested in GSoC. Feedback on these ideas? Andreas Rottmann
2011-04-07 13:21 ` Paul Raccuglia [this message]
2011-04-07 21:45 ` Paul Raccuglia
2011-04-08 0:01 ` Paul Raccuglia
2011-04-08 1:00 ` dsmich
2011-04-08 4:36 ` Paul Raccuglia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTinRjG0vn77JJSO2H5+Zb1Rbeq7m=A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=praccugl@haverford.edu \
--cc=a.rottmann@gmx.at \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).