Re: compiling with -DSCM_DEBUG=1

[Ken Raeburn <raeburn@raeburn.org>]

On Sep 7, 2009, at 05:22, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Non-pair accessed with SCM_C[AD]R: `ERROR: In procedure symbol- 
>> >string:
>> ERROR: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting symbol):
>> #<guardian 124e300 (reachable: 15 unreachable: 1)>
>
> Does that mean it’s this whole string that’s accessed with SCM_C[AD]R?

I'm not sure... it should be printing a value after the quote; I guess  
it's encountering an error trying to print, as well.

>> I use a modified scm_error_pair_access() that prints the function's
>> name (as seen above)
>
> Hmm, I don’t see the function name, except ‘symbol->string’ above, but
> I’d expect it to be part of the string that’s accessed as a pair.

Sorry, I meant scm_error_pair_access() prints out  
"scm_error_pair_access" to let me know it's been called.

> I cannot reproduce it here without SCM_DEBUG but with this simple  
> patch
> instead:

> Any hints?

I would think that would do it, but I'm not seeing it either.  Still  
looking...
(BTW, for SCM_DEBUG=1 I also had to comment out a debugging check  
using SCM_GC_MARK_P in gc.c, since the macro doesn't exist any more.)

Ken