From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ken Raeburn Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: more compilation failures: -DSCM_DEBUG_TYPING_STRICTNESS=2 Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 21:41:08 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87bplu4fbr.fsf@gnu.org> <877hwheplm.fsf@gnu.org> <878wgpf1p7.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1252460508 24712 80.91.229.12 (9 Sep 2009 01:41:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 01:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 09 03:41:41 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MlCBm-0000iE-B7 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 03:41:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44861 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MlCBl-0000cJ-82 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:41:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MlCBc-0000av-OD for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:41:28 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MlCBY-0000Wb-42 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:41:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34548 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MlCBX-0000WN-TJ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:41:23 -0400 Original-Received: from splat.raeburn.org ([69.25.196.39]:56282 helo=raeburn.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlCBL-0004qS-08; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 21:41:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [10.0.0.164] ([10.0.0.164]) by raeburn.org (8.14.3/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n891f8lg022378; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 21:41:08 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <878wgpf1p7.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9285 Archived-At: On Sep 8, 2009, at 19:37, Neil Jerram wrote: > Then, given that you (Ken) think that STRICTNESS 0 doesn't work > either, I'd favour hardcoding the STRICTNESS 1 macros and then > discarding the whole STRICTNESS concept. That (0 not working) is only a guess, but I'll try it out to see. I kind of like keeping STRICTNESS 2, because I'm a bit uncomfortable with the amount of casting going on in some places, and the degree to which it could (theoretically) be masking actual bugs. But if opinion goes against me I'm willing to work on the changes you describe. Ken