From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noah Lavine Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: PEG Parser Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 10:31:31 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87bp3fi5cp.fsf@gnu.org> <87aaisr6sn.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297007105 22666 80.91.229.12 (6 Feb 2011 15:45:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 15:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Lucy , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 06 16:45:00 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pm6nK-0002wU-Ar for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 16:44:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58134 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pm6aO-0004MA-Ge for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 10:31:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45055 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pm6aL-0004Ls-OC for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 10:31:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pm6aK-0002lu-ND for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 10:31:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yi0-f41.google.com ([209.85.218.41]:55517) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pm6aK-0002lj-Jk; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 10:31:32 -0500 Original-Received: by yia25 with SMTP id 25so1769621yia.0 for ; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 07:31:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=24Jr5G15d3y0ZWLU409kGJbszfGb6Nr9lNOxZTdXkBU=; b=rEWVn38jpEuLP1Jf82OnoEv0XzM4IkhT7Ege5uuybVavPKjEZppdUN/S62MWTeFnLf sKVl9saBpzZ1gqIHW5dhzKDheZfnGNh1t/p+WNmhfSAn399e1eMqUuOSPRqJ/7F+rjON dbXrv6vfYQ4aq1070yRuuOrv4R+qPWSwKFUcM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=nBTPfK4BZv5erKI1bUquTDk9Wvin1g6TyWjQ6VPQbCfq5WEnbjdH+jh+sPNlez74kr ne/+oD1pOoEtpa60P27/kJ/97jI9P1lNTLsLZbK/1w3+SF4+jJUSwBGwBSgnrsB45Ywd hAR/qRUVNk2ooYfkqzPPJPuvErO8jLyqtf39c= Original-Received: by 10.146.86.12 with SMTP id j12mr3228993yab.27.1297006291400; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 07:31:31 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.147.40.5 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 07:31:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: oE6kaVeBvdsSwTo9mhiZIxKbjW4 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.218.41 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11537 Archived-At: Hi, > However, I have a suspicion something odd is going on and this does > not contain all of the work it should from guile's repo. I ended up > having to use git cherry-pick instead of git rebase because I had made > a mistake when I first made my local peg branch. I checked out > origin/wip-mlucy and then cherry-picked my commits on top of that. > > It worked well, but in one of my earlier attempts before I decided > that git-rebase wasn't going to work, I saw that someone had renamed > peg-sexp-compile to cg-match-func and added some more test cases to > peg.test. Now I don't see those additions, and if they're not in > wip-mlucy then I'm not sure where to find them. Does anyone know where > I should look for that? Never mind that, sorry. There was a rename, but I was on the correct side of it. I somehow looked at old code and got confused and thought it was new code. The patches should apply cleanly to the head of wip-mlucy, and everything should be fine. Noah