From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Lucy Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: PEG Parser Updates/Questions Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:51:45 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280296351 27532 80.91.229.12 (28 Jul 2010 05:52:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: No Itisnt Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 28 07:52:30 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdzZ4-0002fA-42 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:52:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33549 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OdzZ2-0000dN-Fn for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:52:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55513 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OdzYl-0000dF-OU for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:52:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdzYk-0001kS-He for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:52:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.212.41]:54125) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdzYk-0001kD-Ei for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:52:06 -0400 Original-Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so4523840vws.0 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:52:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2FOMdDMUHv09PMDxFt3VIL20B4x+AI7UILjTIIcAHfI=; b=byUC+pF5fBQJ8kLkbwV3MF1E1iRaUHfOKi7TucBWo7zXIOw2NQRCIeEFZS3iXD8Q5i t5v/wDWlAclk47pg2q8+sv48Zi4/z26ufaqxmTVwK0sVBF+GkmsUBGgPVT5YafJe93UQ AhsfkPlxK3ZsPRE6i4ckISruf+T1xPe5xv57c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=FTbcKvMwVlINyf6GJ78pdzxZqIV9rZGMOkxzhjgTte7OPHu0aJgp76ob4JWiDB5EnD dEVoOUrkAfIH5YFUhWRQ9YpblGDHjqg/VeACeRokt0ngUNupdxWTO9xWR+ZFIgX5xSB8 qPcsviF/q2jCw/yurl4jn/00vyuGpfJ7q2TDk= Original-Received: by 10.220.63.138 with SMTP id b10mr5854598vci.39.1280296325179; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:52:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.220.77.9 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:51:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: Qj75gkGET-SHUsUW_OxuigjT2k0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10742 Archived-At: On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:41 AM, No Itisnt wrot= e: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Michael Lucy w= rote: > >> Another question about module namespaces: =A0I have some syntax that I'd >> like to be available to code generated by macros in my module, but >> which I'd rather not export to the user (to avoid clobbering their >> functions). =A0Is there a standard way of doing this? =A0I can't seem to >> find anything in the module documentation regarding giving namespaces >> to things in modules except for :renamer, which has to be done by the >> user--the only options appear to be not exporting it at all, or >> exporting it straight into the user's namespace. =A0The best fix I can >> think of is naming the syntax things the user is unlikely to ever take >> (or maybe using gensyms to make sure it isn't a name they take). > > I can't speak on the namespace issues and perhaps there is a better > solution, but you can explicitly reference a binding in a module using > @ (exported bindings) or @@ (private bindings) like (@ (guile) list) > to get the function LIST from (guile). Thanks! That works perfectly. >