From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: No Itisnt Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Custom printers for SRFI-9 records Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 16:09:30 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87typvrdja.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274910120 15905 80.91.229.12 (26 May 2010 21:42:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 21:42:00 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 26 23:41:58 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHOMP-0002aQ-57 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 23:41:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41404 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHODZ-0001c5-TD for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 17:32:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58185 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OHNr4-0002eV-9q for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 17:09:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHNr3-0005cn-3j for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 17:09:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.212.41]:39408) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OHNr3-0005cS-0X for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2010 17:09:33 -0400 Original-Received: by vws13 with SMTP id 13so1052791vws.0 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 14:09:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+vUIuaCoaxmBea16oCiA+GfuUYR8eNJjgSu53+b1/5I=; b=oX6MKyxnrEz9I7/R+JsSkkFRhQFHYAlfp7r5PVS1bm3S2Vup/rS/X88lqoEh0K+bSJ EXzEWwLQQN7hKcS5PuTO79k4u9o+CCAVYsZ06iz5vf1b06yHtWxIM7ioVJt1bwzgzRAM PVXSFqCXC0JfTKjZE/vAFuEHBgAimwMgmTDTA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Gvjy2RBgdwaD8xsZDoT8Y1NRgjVJOYw5VEW24hFSIFapi5zd2rUlDgkq6gFMuVhn/q 7Aj2N2mHdw1hviGzrT46xU5QQAinPNOw1Slbu+9VFaYcaIsB0mEfu0sKouG1/sbNk4Wc NMNra1VkHKCLIVjHybxiqpq+AAQ/nih6NQs7A= Original-Received: by 10.229.187.82 with SMTP id cv18mr2058988qcb.83.1274908171329; Wed, 26 May 2010 14:09:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.229.239.84 with HTTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 14:09:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10378 Archived-At: Whoops ! Due to my misunderstanding of 'git push' I committed this to master. I had already committed it to master locally so after I merge it, I guess it pushed my master changes as well when I was trying to push my lua branch. Hopefully I didn't mess up anything else. I read the docs now so it won't happen again. On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:18 PM, No Itisnt wrot= e: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 3:56 PM, No Itisnt wro= te: >> I agree. Here's a patch that adds (srfi srfi-9 gnu) with >> set-record-printer! and adds a subsection to the SRFI-9 part of the >> manual for it. >> I can go ahead and commit it, if that's OK. >> >> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: >>> Hello! >>> >>> No Itisnt writes: >>> >>>> One thing I'm missing, and maybe I just didn't see it, is a way to >>>> define custom printers for SRFI-9 records. >>> >>> I agree that it=92s generally useful, but I think SRFI modules should n= ot >>> diverge from the spec, or when they do, make it separate, as was done >>> with (srfi srfi-4 gnu). >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ludo=92. >>> >>> >>> >> >