* Abandon lock-based synchronization in favor of STM?
@ 2012-02-24 19:52 Mark H Weaver
2012-02-24 21:58 ` Hans Aberg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark H Weaver @ 2012-02-24 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guile-devel
Hello all,
I posted this link to IRC, but for the benefit of others, here's a paper
that I highly recommend for anyone interested in a better way to handle
sychronization and concurrency:
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/simonpj/papers/stm/stm.pdf
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Abandon lock-based synchronization in favor of STM?
2012-02-24 19:52 Abandon lock-based synchronization in favor of STM? Mark H Weaver
@ 2012-02-24 21:58 ` Hans Aberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hans Aberg @ 2012-02-24 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark H Weaver; +Cc: guile-devel
On 24 Feb 2012, at 20:52, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> I posted this link to IRC, but for the benefit of others, here's a paper
> that I highly recommend for anyone interested in a better way to handle
> sychronization and concurrency:
>
> http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/simonpj/papers/stm/stm.pdf
Also described here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_transactional_memory
Hans
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-24 21:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-24 19:52 Abandon lock-based synchronization in favor of STM? Mark H Weaver
2012-02-24 21:58 ` Hans Aberg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).