From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mike Gran Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: non-deterministic test failure Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:49:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <979978.54896.qm@web37906.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <873a2md8e1.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> <87eilo9ztz.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263764989 8736 80.91.229.12 (17 Jan 2010 21:49:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:49:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Neil Jerram , "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 17 22:49:41 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NWd07-0005iB-5J for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:49:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40986 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NWd08-0004Am-3d for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:49:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NWd04-0004A8-SK for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:49:36 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NWczz-00049g-Ok for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:49:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37279 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NWczz-00049c-JC for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:49:31 -0500 Original-Received: from web37906.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.91.168]:25061) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NWczz-0000Yb-0C for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:49:31 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 55874 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Jan 2010 21:49:30 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1263764969; bh=6Iy6Gjo3ZWvTdhkceFRIzBUiSqmC9VYK3sjCa4N5ed0=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ht1w4xEzgbW/HbxiVN2Vwrelzn02U1b1BzdXTRU2y+Ql60G+FHVmIg6rk7dtlF/5mxOMkLhQ84lGlM26ZCMRFXEd1/XiaUSqOPHScLsEOayxt3vJiiVNWVYgFXEdlkS3ONiPPM0KyPH7CMkwdYRKo0uN/vgjbL5Dsc+79frv8hI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lEgJfWTj5d75mcsnzezkgOX0OaD3iJEfBvAp2x1MP01W8X0KMyOO48u10XXVGiVWRgPLttQusqZkA026kG+9b35f1iO3ChY4BXolzWktT/I2za2qJliwJmQP5J0c0LhpPNs8ZAk+d7R0ay2aMlfOA4Kg/Uek1eEMLiArCFsvUj8=; X-YMail-OSG: c30Vi1oVM1kqFZbeuYo.PdaZ5LzBgWiY0s4j77RrEXB8rEq.QWw87ilVlP5DNmRMYBFLbMZQ17Cu3.fLS2YKXJvA8t6HYPfkw__bo1XR.y7.WL.CxJ2ejPhKjbanvFvHO41fGGIilgRuoeGmSyr.nZnvEblIok2NMGXRl6jISFTcNeHlWc0u5993O1RhNOrhrrhniEjQkYqyDnHYpk.gnJqfeFV5kX9Xcz7wmeBLTb5cH72PRp6oIsqS6x.5g0z4S0E_NLoi1wzIm3R8HU_8FX.5XAN.Vww_CAx9GOpODOvWH2Yov2mcL.79ivul1PAsYrCWsdJpYpLedpKhNrDOXKieBfHnIo1xAlctzcMhPp4- Original-Received: from [71.130.217.199] by web37906.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:49:29 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/272.7 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 In-Reply-To: <87eilo9ztz.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 6.x (1) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9889 Archived-At: > From: Neil Jerram > "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" writes: > > > hi, > > > > during the last month or so, the threads test in 1.9.x has been failing > > for me (debian unstable, x86 box) intermittently, with the message: > > > > FAIL: threads.test: lock-mutex: timed locking succeeds if mutex unlocked > > within timeout > > > > it happens every now and then, but i haven't been able to pin down the > > cause (i'm not familiar with the code and haven't looked at it much), or > > to reproduce the error consistently (although with the current it seems > > to happen almost always). am i the only one? > > No, I think I've seen this too. Intermittently though, as you say. > I get the same fairly often when I compile CFLAGS="-g3 -gdwarf-2 -O0". I imagine that it is the "-O0" zero optimization that has something to do with it. -Mike