unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lloda <lloda@sarc.name>
To: "guile-devel@gnu.org" <guile-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Add internal definitions to derived forms
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 12:17:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8EAB1A86-3B8E-488F-9190-4F4F00F1FD48@sarc.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y1pqslab.fsf@gnu.org>


Guile already allows mixed definitions and expressions in let bodies (since 2.9.4), which isn't in any of the Scheme reports. It's up to authors to avoid or isolate Guile extensions if they want to remain rnrs compatible, and this patch doesn't change that.

Being able to put definitions in the body of let but not in the bodies of these other forms is an artificial restriction. Some forms still aren't fixed, like match. I believe we should eventually fix those as well.

I think the root of the issue is (begin), but the patch goes in the right direction.

Regards

  Daniel






      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-02 11:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-09 15:32 Add internal definitions to derived forms Linus Björnstam
2022-11-09 15:46 ` Damien Mattei
2022-11-17  7:25 ` lloda
2022-11-18  9:04   ` Linus Björnstam
2022-11-18  9:27     ` Lassi Kortela
2022-11-18  9:50       ` Linus Björnstam
2022-11-18 10:22         ` Lassi Kortela
2022-11-18 12:53           ` Linus Björnstam
2022-11-18 13:18             ` Lassi Kortela
2023-01-19 17:54             ` lloda
2023-01-20 17:37               ` lloda
2023-01-23 22:13                 ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-01-23 23:28                   ` lloda
2023-01-24  7:33                     ` Linus Björnstam
2023-01-24  9:02                     ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-01-24 17:59                       ` lloda
2023-01-25 10:33                         ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-01-25 15:09 ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-01-25 15:38   ` Greg Troxel
2023-01-25 21:38     ` Linus Björnstam
2023-01-25 21:06   ` Linus Björnstam
2023-02-02 11:17   ` lloda [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8EAB1A86-3B8E-488F-9190-4F4F00F1FD48@sarc.name \
    --to=lloda@sarc.name \
    --cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).