unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Aberg <haberg-1@telia.com>
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Growable arrays?
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:36:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8E0C96A7-558F-40F4-94F0-A3469E199477@telia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87hauku0mb.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>

On 9 Jun 2012, at 14:32, David Kastrup wrote:

> Scheme/Guile vectors are fixed size.  Now I have a situation where I
> have a basic type lattice with records stored in vectors, and this type
> lattice may be extended dynamically (which typically happens at the
> start of a whole file, for potentially multi-file runs).  Scheme does
> not offer a suitable data structure for that.

If only grows at one end, something like C++ std::deque might be suitable. It has the advantage of not having to invoke copy constructors when it grows.

Hans






  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-12 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-09 12:32 Growable arrays? David Kastrup
2012-06-09 14:43 ` Krister Svanlund
2012-06-09 17:35   ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11  4:23 ` Daniel Hartwig
2012-06-11  4:37   ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11  5:00     ` Daniel Hartwig
2012-06-11  7:25       ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11  9:01         ` Daniel Hartwig
2012-06-11  9:13           ` Daniel Hartwig
2012-06-11 10:38             ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11 11:57               ` Daniel Hartwig
2012-06-11 12:13         ` Noah Lavine
2012-06-11 12:28           ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11 23:50             ` Mark H Weaver
2012-06-12  9:34               ` David Kastrup
2012-06-12 20:34                 ` Mark H Weaver
2012-06-12 20:47                   ` David Kastrup
2012-06-12 21:03                     ` Mark H Weaver
2012-06-12 21:18                       ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11  8:14 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2012-06-11  9:08 ` Andy Wingo
2012-06-11  9:55   ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11 11:25     ` Andy Wingo
2012-06-11 12:00       ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11 12:12         ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11 12:20           ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11 13:04             ` Daniel Hartwig
2012-06-11 14:19               ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11 15:24                 ` Stefan Israelsson Tampe
2012-06-11 15:27                 ` Andy Wingo
2012-06-11 16:03                   ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11 12:20         ` Daniel Hartwig
2012-06-11 12:36           ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11 12:02 ` Ludovic Courtès
2012-06-12 13:36 ` Hans Aberg [this message]
2012-06-14 14:33 ` Mark H Weaver
2012-06-14 14:47   ` David Kastrup
2012-06-14 15:23     ` Daniel Hartwig
2012-06-14 15:34       ` David Kastrup
2012-06-14 16:56         ` Daniel Hartwig
2012-06-14 17:15           ` David Kastrup
2012-06-14 17:23             ` Daniel Hartwig
2012-06-14 17:49               ` David Kastrup

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8E0C96A7-558F-40F4-94F0-A3469E199477@telia.com \
    --to=haberg-1@telia.com \
    --cc=dak@gnu.org \
    --cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).