From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Handling BUGS. Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 18:54:52 -0600 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87zo112zhf.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <87g02t4zgn.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016758640 13986 127.0.0.1 (22 Mar 2002 00:57:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 00:57:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16oDMu-0003dT-00 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 01:57:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16oDMg-0006u9-00; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 19:57:06 -0500 Original-Received: from dsl-209-87-109-2.constant.com ([209.87.109.2] helo=defaultvalue.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16oDKY-0006lF-00 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 19:54:54 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83638333F; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 18:54:53 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2EF021DF1; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 18:54:52 -0600 (CST) Original-To: Neil Jerram In-Reply-To: (Neil Jerram's message of "21 Mar 2002 23:09:11 +0000") Original-Lines: 22 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.1 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:145 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:145 Neil Jerram writes: > All sounds good to me, but how do we indicate that a bug has been > fixed in one tree but not in another? Just change it's "affects:" field. i.e. you could have affects: 1.4 1.6 1.7 and when it's fixed in 1.6, just delete it from the line. The only time a bug would move to resolved is if it's been fixed in *all* trees. In this first, fairly simplistic approach, I mostly just figured resolved as a place old bugs go to die to at least *somewhat* reduce the inevitable clutter we'll have in active. In the long term, pumping this stuff into postgres via guile-pg or similar may be the way to go, but that's a problem for our future selves :> -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel