From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [d.love@dl.ac.uk: dynamic loading of native code modules] Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:25:22 -0500 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87znztllbx.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <878z7rqfrg.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019626056 5712 127.0.0.1 (24 Apr 2002 05:27:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 05:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 170FJX-0001U1-00 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 07:27:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 170FJC-0004iD-00; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 01:27:14 -0400 Original-Received: from dsl-209-87-109-2.constant.com ([209.87.109.2] helo=defaultvalue.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 170FHQ-0004fj-00; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 01:25:24 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7404A1E5; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:25:22 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 513572EC8; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:25:22 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: ttn@glug.org In-Reply-To: (Thien-Thi Nguyen's message of "Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:24:34 -0700") Original-Lines: 39 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:485 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:485 Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > you should write down your good idea under workbook/ so that it can be > refined w/ input from all stakeholders (notably the users!). keeping it > a secret doesn't help. delaying "discussion" (which is lost in the spam > ridden archives) is not recommended. With the time I have for guile between now and next Monday, what I actually *will* be doing is trying to finish up my two release critical bugs, and checking the other release critical bugs. If I'm finished with my bugs by Monday, and if I haven't heard anything else with respect to the remaining release critical issues from anyone else by then, I'm planning to handle those remaining issues myself. Without further input, this will result in them being moved to "Eventually" since I'll presume that no one disagreed with my assesment in the last "Items blocking release 1.6.1" email. After all that I will release the next guile unstable beta. Then, if no serious, agreed upon bugs or todo items crop up within a week of *that* release, I will release 1.6.1. During this process, if I have time, I may also integrate my release management proposals into the more permanent workbook docs. *After* the stable release I will get to other guile related items that are on my more general to do list, a list which includes plenty of non-guile, real-life items as well. The guile items on that list already included: working on the versioning issue (discussion, documentation, and implementation) and revising various things in workbook/. BTW: have you read workbook/bugs/versioning-of-extensions? It's not nearly complete, but it's what I've had time to write down as yet. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel