From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Rottmann Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: What can I do to help? (conclusions) Date: 08 Oct 2002 19:27:43 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87zntorgc0.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> References: <20021004132911.GD20754@www> <87k7ky5ggq.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> <20021006170804.GA7206@www> <87ofa71nfh.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> <87hefzjgng.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87hefyyjxb.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <874rbwsxih.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1034098254 4505 127.0.0.1 (8 Oct 2002 17:30:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 17:30:54 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17yyBu-00019P-00 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 19:30:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17yyAR-0005Uf-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 13:29:11 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17yy9a-0004y8-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 13:28:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17yy9X-0004sK-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 13:28:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.10) id 17yy9W-0004rd-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 13:28:15 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 26950 invoked by uid 0); 8 Oct 2002 17:28:13 -0000 Original-Received: from m192p007.adsl.highway.telekom.at (HELO alice.rhinosaur.lan) (62.47.191.231) by mail.gmx.net (mp014-rz3) with SMTP; 8 Oct 2002 17:28:13 -0000 Original-Received: from andy by alice.rhinosaur.lan with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 17yy92-0003Ym-00 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 19:27:44 +0200 Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <874rbwsxih.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> Original-Lines: 28 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1477 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1477 Andreas Rottmann writes: > Rob Browning writes: > > > Marius Vollmer writes: > > > > > In my experience, you don't need to do that on GNU/Linux but you need > > > to on Solaris. Does that match your experience? > > > > > > In any case: do you have a patch? We might even link with g++ by > > > default when it is available. > > > > What actual differences are there when linking with g++ instead of > > gcc? For example, will it affect the size or performance of the > > resulting binaries much? > > > I don't think so, nevertheless the resulting binary will be linked > against libstdc++. However, when I get guile working again (see my > other mail, subject "CVS Build problems"), I will suplly a patch and > can run some benchmarks (there are some, don't we?), if you'd like. > s/don't we/ain't there/ Andy -- Andreas Rottmann | Dru@ICQ | 118634484@ICQ | a.rottmann@gmx.at http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel