From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: libguile-ltdl Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:54:58 -0500 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87zn3admwt.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> References: <16729.59272.304160.381196@byrd.xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1096412235 29167 80.91.229.6 (28 Sep 2004 22:57:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:57:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 29 00:57:01 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CCQu5-0004YR-00 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:57:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CCR0O-0007Ri-JC for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:03:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CCR06-0007Qb-4e for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:03:15 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CCR03-0007Q8-Oi for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:03:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CCR03-0007Q1-HW for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:03:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [66.93.216.237] (helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CCQtM-00067a-VO for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:56:17 -0400 Original-Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (omen.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.1]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33513FB1; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:56:15 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B2679410A1; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:54:58 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: hanwen@xs4all.nl In-Reply-To: <16729.59272.304160.381196@byrd.xs4all.nl> (Han-Wen Nienhuys's message of "Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:36:56 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:4186 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:4186 Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > Can someone remind why GUILE uses a separate branch of the ltdl > library? There were bugs in libltdl (serious ones) that were stalled upstream for a long time. Since then, I believe all of them have been fixed, so our code is now essentially identical to upstream libtool. However, we'll need to discuss what to do next because there's still the possiblity that we might want to add a versioned dlopen to our copy, and that the upstream libtool developers wouldn't be interested. > (For chrissakes, when will 1.6.5 be released?) Should be by next week (perhaps later this week). There were some fixes I noticed last week that had to go in, and then I had to go out of town. I'm now finishing an update of the debian/ tree and then I think it'll be ready. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel