From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: ash rewrite Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:29:34 -0600 Message-ID: <87zmyd5sn5.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> References: <87oefaqyiu.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107985507 19461 80.91.229.2 (9 Feb 2005 21:45:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 09 22:45:07 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cyzdb-0004cU-6l for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 22:44:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyzsC-0001Hg-G3 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 16:59:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cyzs2-0001Do-Vh for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 16:59:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Cyzs0-0001D3-VE for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 16:59:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cyzpz-0000WV-Q3 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 16:57:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [66.93.216.237] (helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CyzOy-0000pz-Ei for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 16:29:36 -0500 Original-Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (omen.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.1]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C32E3FE4 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:29:35 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5D8F141093; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:29:34 -0600 (CST) Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87oefaqyiu.fsf@zip.com.au> (Kevin Ryde's message of "Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:48:25 +1100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:4764 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:4764 Kevin Ryde writes: > I checked in my rewrite of ash, it should be much faster than using > integer-expt. Hmm I noticed that at least on my machine, make check fails with current CVS. I don't know if it's related, and haven't had a chance to investigate further: Running fractions.test ERROR: fractions.test: fractions: (eqv? (ash 1/2 0) 1/2) - arguments: ((wrong-type-arg "ash" "Wrong type argument in position ~A: ~S" (1 1/2) (1/2))) ERROR: fractions.test: fractions: (eqv? (ash 1/2 1) 1) - arguments: ((wrong-type-arg "ash" "Wrong type argument in position ~A: ~S" (1 1/2) (1/2))) Running gc.test -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel