From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Rottmann Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: SLIB support Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:56:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87zlzq1ruz.fsf@gkar.rotty.yi.org> References: <874pi13xer.fsf@gkar.rotty.yi.org> <87veaf3nq7.fsf@gkar.rotty.yi.org> <87lkbbau8j.fsf@chbouib.org> <87k5qu3dy1.fsf@gkar.rotty.yi.org> <87y7famv5n.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189699032 16747 80.91.229.12 (13 Sep 2007 15:57:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org, Greg Troxel To: Rob Browning Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 13 17:57:09 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IVr3i-00086o-W6 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:56:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVr3i-0000jM-Ok for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:56:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IVr3e-0000i6-Mj for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:56:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IVr3c-0000ds-0q for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:56:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVr3b-0000dl-U0 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:56:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IVr3b-0005er-B9 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:56:43 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2007 15:56:42 -0000 Original-Received: from chello084112165172.30.11.vie.surfer.at (EHLO localhost.localdomain) [84.112.165.172] by mail.gmx.net (mp021) with SMTP; 13 Sep 2007 17:56:42 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3102804 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+qpn48YQSq7lwgp6ASkmmO0DbTGZ1FLcxJRSWFNu 86dHJ8TSq3xpSh Original-Received: from rotty by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IVr3U-0005bv-W1; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:56:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y7famv5n.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> (Rob Browning's message of "Thu\, 13 Sep 2007 08\:39\:48 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: a.rottmann@gmx.at X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:39:36 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on localhost.localdomain) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6790 Archived-At: Rob Browning writes: > Greg Troxel writes: > >> Shouldn't slib/guile.init, being the standard place, be first? Or >> has slib moved it in a more recent version? > > I think ice-9/slib.scm should only look for guile.init in it's normal, > default upstream location. > OK. > Has SLIB used both locations, or is one of them where the Debian SLIB > package moves the file? If the latter, then I'd be inclined to let > Debian handle that in the Debian diff rather than add a distribution > specific adjustment to Guile's code. > The latter. I agree that doing this in the Debian diff is cleaner/preferable. Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann | Rotty@ICQ | 118634484@ICQ | a.rottmann@gmx.at http://rotty.uttx.net | GnuPG Key: http://rotty.uttx.net/gpg.asc Fingerprint | C38A 39C5 16D7 B69F 33A3 6993 22C8 27F7 35A9 92E7 v2sw7MYChw5pr5OFma7u7Lw2m5g/l7Di6e6t5BSb7en6g3/5HZa2Xs6MSr1/2p7 hackerkey.com A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel