From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Build failure on master Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:19:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87zlb7767q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1247412093.30108.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <87bpnpva3w.fsf@gnu.org> <874otf7min.fsf@arudy.ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1247577632 4642 80.91.229.12 (14 Jul 2009 13:20:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:20:32 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 14 15:20:25 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MQhvf-0005A2-Kx for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:20:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53344 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MQhvd-0003Ov-Fq for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:20:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MQhuw-0002c4-0g for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:19:34 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MQhur-0002Vb-44 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:19:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46803 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MQhuq-0002VH-VL for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:19:29 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:60431 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MQhuq-0001UP-C8 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:19:28 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MQhue-00052x-8h for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:19:16 +0000 Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:19:16 +0000 Original-Received: from ludo by reverse-83.fdn.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:19:16 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 28 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: reverse-83.fdn.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 26 Messidor an 217 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Au4K/+bPkDwRJb1n1jH2NomJQZU= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:8865 Archived-At: Neil Jerram writes: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Hi Mike, >> >> Mike Gran writes: >> >>> ERROR: In procedure make_objcode_by_mmap: >>> ERROR: bad header on object file: "GOOF-0.5" >> >> Make sure to remove all `.go' files from your source tree and from the >> cache (either `~/.guile-ccache' or `~/.cache/guile/ccache'). Then >> hopefully you'll be able to compile Guile. > > Surely the point of having a version number on the object file format > would be to actually take notice of it, and to change the number when > we make format changes...? > > (I'm assuming that this problem was caused by a format change...) Yes. Currently, the code just checks for the magic cookie (see `make_objcode_by_mmap ()'), and if it differs, e.g., because the version isn't right, it just bails out. Eventually,