From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: mtime of fresh .go Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:30:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87zkxmru93.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87mxtrdf42.fsf@gnu.org> <87vd8cv2v7.fsf@gnu.org> <87wrsrxgkb.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1279644920 3310 80.91.229.12 (20 Jul 2010 16:55:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:55:20 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 20 18:55:19 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObG69-0000TU-Uf for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:55:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34440 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ObG68-0001wQ-W2 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:55:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33943 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ObFiE-0004E2-Kd for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:30:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObFi7-0001uY-RW for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:30:32 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:60919) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObFi7-0001uI-KB for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:30:27 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObFi4-0004NZ-TQ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:30:24 +0200 Original-Received: from acces.bordeaux.inria.fr ([193.50.110.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:30:24 +0200 Original-Received: from ludo by acces.bordeaux.inria.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:30:24 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: acces.bordeaux.inria.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 2 Thermidor an 218 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:SHqjTz5wMOpMQO4otkWZAlkSM3o= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10704 Archived-At: Andy Wingo writes: > Continuing this, it seems that you really want automake to handle Guile > better. Why not submit a patch to automake instead? Heh. :-) I’ve had this on my to-do list for a while, but with a low priority. Thanks, Ludo’.