From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] [mingw]: Do not export opendir, readdir etc., as dirents differ. Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:22:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87zklhe7se.fsf@pobox.com> References: <1297784103-18322-1-git-send-email-janneke-list@xs4all.nl> <1297784103-18322-4-git-send-email-janneke-list@xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308262964 5512 80.91.229.12 (16 Jun 2011 22:22:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:22:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 17 00:22:40 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXKxT-0004CV-R5 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:22:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57236 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXKxS-0005km-Rl for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:22:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56630) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXKx5-0005ke-OA for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:22:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXKx4-00026R-3q for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:22:15 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:41684 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXKx4-00026M-1K; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:22:14 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E78F5A42; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:24:23 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=fSXPZ217rDhfoIK4aqFJ3KkCU1M=; b=NMBL5q c4tqOn2oGFFpWJUvzylXYGNVJBa2Q4ndOY2Ogo8CGER5uW1O9E4Fu935+pyNHuh0 Md/NDlc+vySSGsulTXBsWb3ATRiBus7AiV3kto+w9ihFOA7JCrIoOgLCtYqzzvcw o3PAaffHgIFLnfXnemr8QafPXRfMiJajcnl9g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=YutcbTmx2PWPJBNC/wqiWGSA1y/k1xPw 9RX6Fucxuifc8SRA7FPRVhbASYfCT+36sEMrxbK0YbXmgwbyDfaeVkK8QOe1DbIG zhMg5L64U61cV70DpYH24vy8K+gqmaJGyoG04183aRl/ZTOcUtLlw4cics+9hq/G v5xEt+o0/e4= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCC15A41; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:24:23 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9661C5A40; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:24:22 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Fri, 20 May 2011 15:57:12 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 62C9D314-9867-11E0-9C5F-5875C023C68D-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12576 Archived-At: On Fri 20 May 2011 15:57, Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > Andy Wingo writes: > >> If mingw defines variants of these routines, why are we not using them >> directly? > > Good question. That may well be a better approach. I have removed these files from Guile. We can revert that commit if it does not work. Would you mind trying current git on your build system? We would like to release 2.0.2 shortly. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/