From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Doc: protecting procedure->pointer pointers from GC Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:44:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87zkd4uryp.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87sjiwq3jv.fsf@neil-laptop.ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328003076 19604 80.91.229.3 (31 Jan 2012 09:44:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:44:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 31 10:44:32 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RsAGN-00056J-Pe for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:44:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47588 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsAGN-0006Pq-Bz for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:44:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40428) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsAGG-000680-Ml for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:44:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsAGB-0004Tq-0d for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:44:24 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:64353 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsAGA-0004Tm-UM for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:44:18 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27FD5D6B; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:44:18 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=emjumKyW9qFjKV6jIkPMy8XPg+4=; b=L2dK2J +Pzn/ULQfaLqAIaxbb38ChY8AEcFP4NlvBYew1GBgMPcCmoDzKrNMSMN97JNgx9X bA5NaKgPiqGN9KMJSzyut9tK2bP6P10eRSAMagc0Ljf0cvjrV5hX51tu5rFfbSVc +RVMZF7A09ZshR1qTiVsKzaZLMPV3pRoT2cM8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=lg/0TN+06AKEGOZBkA9S38HJwwYsIrzD VSnLr31HqDVd6Eb5LQcdqovcTU9nR8ATXR6B6J25JgYMVGEbnHe7yj/FAiM7tKq8 g863UNAhuAYJJC3SaRN+pyjrHa+Hbypr/QctEA2dSIa04VTqn8fsieCeYK0OygoK U2sDpoeSuOs= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3C75D6A; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:44:18 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [85.50.103.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A1165D69; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:44:17 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87sjiwq3jv.fsf@neil-laptop.ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:32:52 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 24FBF11A-4BF0-11E1-BC10-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:13759 Archived-At: On Mon 30 Jan 2012 22:32, Neil Jerram writes: > Following debugging of a strange issue where oFono appeared to be > sending a D-Bus signal from the wrong object, but I eventually realised > that the problem was in my own code... The docs are good, but the example is irritating ;) Is there a reason you are unable to use guile-gnome for the object wrapping? You can use the FFI to call scm_from_gtype_instance or whatever it's called, after loading (gnome gobject). Andy -- http://wingolog.org/