From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Bug Reports for 1.6 Release Candidates Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 21:46:57 -0600 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87y9gq8rm6.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <87it7wz6r0.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87u1rfdhcd.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87vgbvf8ga.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016423294 20806 127.0.0.1 (18 Mar 2002 03:48:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 03:48:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16mo86-0005PU-00 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 04:48:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16mo7x-0002iA-00; Sun, 17 Mar 2002 22:48:05 -0500 Original-Received: from dsl-209-87-109-2.constant.com ([209.87.109.2] helo=defaultvalue.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16mo6s-0002gs-00 for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2002 22:46:58 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D85C41C93; Sun, 17 Mar 2002 21:46:57 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B7D79212E; Sun, 17 Mar 2002 21:46:57 -0600 (CST) Original-To: Evan Prodromou In-Reply-To: <87vgbvf8ga.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> (Evan Prodromou's message of "Sun, 17 Mar 2002 10:46:45 -0600") Original-Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.1 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:108 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:108 Evan Prodromou writes: > Also, the BUGS file as it stands doesn't have a criticality rating > (wishlist, normal, release-critical, whatever) nor a version number > that the bug was identified in (1.4, 1.5.x, 1.7.x, etc.), nor a > version number that the bug _should_ be fixed in (1.5.x, 1.7.x). Agreed, and it might be nice to have some other way to keep the info for a bug that applies across more than one tree in one location (see my reply to your other thread) if we can manage to do it with a solution that doesn't just over-complicate things. Though bug tracking seems to me like *exactly* the kind of thing for which you want a relational DB. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel