From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Cross building and Cygwin fixes. Date: 09 Jul 2002 20:08:15 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87y9ckdbao.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <87r8ikdbj6.fsf@peder.flower> <87hejb6ztn.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87eleebl6u.fsf@peder.flower> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026238113 25837 127.0.0.1 (9 Jul 2002 18:08:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:08:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, Han-Wen Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17RzPc-0006ic-00 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 20:08:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17RzQ9-0000Su-00; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 14:09:05 -0400 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip23.dokom.de ([195.138.42.23] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17RzPM-0000SN-00 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 14:08:17 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 1452 invoked by uid 1000); 9 Jul 2002 18:08:15 -0000 Original-To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen In-Reply-To: <87eleebl6u.fsf@peder.flower> Original-Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:762 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:762 Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > > Wouldn't it be better to fix the check for in > > configure.in? > > Possibly. But then it's not a HAVE_WINSOCK2, but rather a > WANT_WINSOCK2. If configure.in only changes 'have' into want if not > Cygwin, that would maybe be cleaner. Yes. Can you provide a patch? _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel