From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: scm_make_gsubr question Date: 20 Jan 2003 09:58:20 +0100 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87y95gyz83.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <20030119204023.GA22802@masanjin.net> <87hec48bzt.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1043053192 3736 80.91.224.249 (20 Jan 2003 08:59:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 08:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Neil Jerram Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18aXmW-0000xr-00 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 09:59:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18aXmE-0002qJ-04 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 03:59:30 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18aXm2-0002gU-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 03:59:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18aXlg-0001wc-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 03:58:58 -0500 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip249.dokom.de ([195.138.42.249] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18aXlF-0001bL-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 03:58:30 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 29940 invoked by uid 1000); 20 Jan 2003 08:58:20 -0000 Original-To: Rob Browning In-Reply-To: <87hec48bzt.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> Original-Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Original-cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-cc: William Morgan X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1878 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1878 Rob Browning writes: > Neil Jerram writes: > > > - The corresponding operation on the Scheme level is achieved much > > more elegantly by closure. > > [...] > > > - The most sensible approach IMO for a Guile-based application is to > > do the minimum possible in C for the maximum benefit in Scheme. > > I tend to agree. I wonder how often a user_data solution would be > better than restructuring the problem... However, when his patch is nice and clean, we can have it both! We do already have 'compiled closures', but I think they are a bit obscure... -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel