From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Updating NEWS for 1.6.8 release. Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:40:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87y84s82ju.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87br1qr52s.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87k6gefohb.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <874q7ip37b.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <877jcdb3ja.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87psq5awmb.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1129570957 12624 80.91.229.2 (17 Oct 2005 17:42:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 17 19:42:35 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERYyy-0003Kl-8a for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:41:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERYyx-0001oo-Lu for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:41:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ERYyc-0001mA-Or for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:40:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ERYyb-0001ly-5K for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:40:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERYyb-0001lv-02 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:40:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.84.72.33] (helo=mail3.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ERYyb-0000oG-3D for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:40:45 -0400 Original-Received: from laruns (host81-139-127-30.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.139.127.30]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AEB2409FA9; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:40:44 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from laruns (laruns [127.0.0.1]) by laruns (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE6756F6C4; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:40:37 +0100 (BST) Original-To: Rob Browning In-Reply-To: <87psq5awmb.fsf@zip.com.au> (Kevin Ryde's message of "Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:08:12 +1000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5302 Archived-At: Kevin Ryde writes: > Neil Jerram writes: >> >> Thanks. In this case, I'm pretty sure my bug fixes don't qualify as >> NEWS. > > What is the continuations versus stack bit you added some tests for? > Is it a fix for something? Yes, for `(call/cc make-stack)'. make-stack is supposed to be able to construct a stack from a continuation, a debug object, or from `#t', which means the current evaluation stack. But the make-stack code was missing a lot of the relocations that are needed in the continuation case. The symptom was a segmentation fault. I forget now exactly how I discovered this, though. Is it worth me trying to dig that up? Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel