unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.de>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm.
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 01:38:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y83kyzs4.fsf@zagadka.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87acg0gvq0.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> (Rob Browning's message of "Sat, 19 Nov 2005 13:43:03 -0800")

Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org> writes:

> A minor difference regards output-port-width.  The version in slib.scm
> returns 80 where the version in guile.init returns 79.
>
> A more significant question regards evaluation.  In slib.scm we have:
> [...]
> where guile.init has:
> [...]

I'd say that in both cases, and in fact in all cases of overlap,
guile.init should win.  Having differing definitions is clearly bad,
and since SLIB has a guile.init, we should bow to it.

Whenever we want to do things differently, we should push those
changes into SLIB.

-- 
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3  331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405


_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel


  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-19 23:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-16  5:23 Future of ice-9/slib.scm Rob Browning
2005-11-16  7:50 ` klaus schilling
2005-11-16 10:14   ` Andy Wingo
2005-11-17 19:16     ` Rob Browning
2005-11-16 15:38 ` Greg Troxel
2005-11-18  3:56   ` Rob Browning
2005-11-18 11:46     ` Greg Troxel
2005-11-19 14:22     ` Marius Vollmer
2005-11-19 18:09       ` Rob Browning
2005-11-19 21:43         ` Rob Browning
2005-11-19 23:38           ` Marius Vollmer [this message]
2005-11-20  1:06             ` Rob Browning
2005-11-20 20:01               ` Rob Browning
2005-11-20 21:09                 ` Kevin Ryde
2005-11-20 23:27                   ` Rob Browning
2005-12-09 20:42                     ` Rob Browning
2005-12-11  0:59                       ` Kevin Ryde
2005-12-11  6:08                         ` Rob Browning
2005-12-12 19:39                           ` Greg Troxel
2005-12-13  1:33                             ` Rob Browning

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y83kyzs4.fsf@zagadka.de \
    --to=mvo@zagadka.de \
    --cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).