From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: SLIB support Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:39:48 -0700 Message-ID: <87y7famv5n.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> References: <874pi13xer.fsf@gkar.rotty.yi.org> <87veaf3nq7.fsf@gkar.rotty.yi.org> <87lkbbau8j.fsf@chbouib.org> <87k5qu3dy1.fsf@gkar.rotty.yi.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189698316 13808 80.91.229.12 (13 Sep 2007 15:45:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:45:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org, Ludovic To: Greg Troxel Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 13 17:45:12 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IVqnR-0000sO-89 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:40:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVqnQ-0007YQ-Vc for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:40:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IVqnN-0007Y4-PG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:39:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IVqnM-0007WN-12 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:39:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVqnL-0007WK-VN for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:39:55 -0400 Original-Received: from li12-156.members.linode.com ([70.85.129.156] helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IVqnI-0001n4-P3; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:39:52 -0400 Original-Received: from omen.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6772890D7E; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:39:48 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from raven.defaultvalue.org (raven.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by omen.defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C8A340A8; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:39:48 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by raven.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1093926419D; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:39:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Greg Troxel's message of "Thu\, 13 Sep 2007 10\:15\:20 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6789 Archived-At: Greg Troxel writes: > Shouldn't slib/guile.init, being the standard place, be first? Or > has slib moved it in a more recent version? I think ice-9/slib.scm should only look for guile.init in it's normal, default upstream location. Has SLIB used both locations, or is one of them where the Debian SLIB package moves the file? If the latter, then I'd be inclined to let Debian handle that in the Debian diff rather than add a distribution specific adjustment to Guile's code. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel