From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel,gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel Subject: Re: %module-public-interface Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:32:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87y6h0r6sf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zl1pv89p.fsf@gnu.org> <87d3ylv5oe.fsf@gnu.org> <4BB53617.7060700@hulin.org.uk> <87y6h6kxei.fsf@gnu.org> <4BB5DBF7.6050700@hulin.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1270564334 14571 80.91.229.12 (6 Apr 2010 14:32:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 14:32:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ian Hulin , guile-devel@gnu.org, "lilypond-devel@gnu.org" To: hanwen@xs4all.nl Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 06 16:32:13 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nz9p5-0004fd-PV for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:32:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41694 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nz9p5-0005YK-0r for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:32:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nz9p0-0005Wn-EI for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:32:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45912 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nz9oy-0005Vr-Kj for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:32:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nz9ow-0006TU-TY for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:32:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.82]:20467) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nz9ow-0006TK-NF; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:32:02 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,372,1267398000"; d="scan'208";a="56573572" Original-Received: from laptop-147-210-128-170.labri.fr (HELO nixey) ([147.210.128.170]) by mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 06 Apr 2010 16:32:01 +0200 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 17 Germinal an 218 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: (Han-Wen Nienhuys's message of "Tue, 6 Apr 2010 11:00:49 -0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10150 gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel:28335 Archived-At: Hi, Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Ian Hulin wrote: [...] >> I'm not the ReleaseMeister for Lilypond; you'll get a better picture by >> talking to Graham Percival (graham@percival-music.ca). >> >> But FWIW it looks like we're on our few last development releases before= the >> stable V2.14 comes out. =C2=A0It's near enough for a spoof release annou= ncement >> to have gone out on the mailing list on April 1st which suckered me! >> >> I reckon plans are for Lilypond to stick with Guile V1.8.7 at least until >> the next Lilypond stable version after V2.14, but again, mileage may var= y if >> you talk to more experienced Lilypond people. > > Is Guile 2.0 already released? No. 1.9 pre-releases are available from alpha.gnu.org (make sure to give it a try!); 2.0 should happen within a couple of months. > I think it makes sense to forget about guile 2.0 for the 2.14 release, > and require 2.0 for the 2.16 release. We could scrap lots of hairy GC > code if we could move to 2.0 (2.0 supports boehm GC, right?) Yes. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.