From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Can `make tags' generate tags for Scheme source, as well as C? Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 20:03:18 +0200 Message-ID: <87y6a3cmqh.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> References: <87d3skxjd6.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87ocbzf4xn.fsf@gnu.org> <87pqvphb4d.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87r5g5h99i.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> <87lj64pfto.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <877hhoe5an.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> <8739sbehjl.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286906623 4945 80.91.229.12 (12 Oct 2010 18:03:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:03:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, Neil Jerram To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 12 20:03:41 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P5jCO-0001Rr-55 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 20:03:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48271 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P5jCN-0002bq-Kn for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:03:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43085 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P5jCF-0002ba-Uq for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:03:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5jC8-0000eA-3i for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:03:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:36194) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5jC7-0000e1-VG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:03:24 -0400 Original-Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so1546124wyf.0 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:03:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:x-attribution:x-url:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=ig+PP97UKJK05yOkrCq0XwG9Gk5QI1pspwLRsZ70Ji4=; b=t06k8eNIhROBzjR6T7UfOnMZdFPrL4wiA4M2dTUEiZSFAenN98jhc9ckCbDupzQZPs hl7nLmKwNGP5QtQh5ZL06Zs/VbNh5Cx0Ov2NLCr9H1OnVXfZxA+kG8pq3wlp/Kt0/maw 9D02vywooVHvfy5jPmNkES5edtDR9lmS+tyfc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :x-attribution:x-url:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; b=V2+IadL/RYe1FocExjFSbwiaCjJzqxz8Q312UNA5+4JWFeKuZQYumlkoYYtd7U/zfl yh83SnT17Riy71yp0XGxKXg21VBxEZRsLDvJ8fQIFZ/OFbw3b8VAcVSgJMZ7pBZU7ZKp A2NsMqcYryePF0/m76pmY5WUKgeBKi+R4H2bY= Original-Received: by 10.216.30.10 with SMTP id j10mr204219wea.8.1286906603189; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:03:23 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from newton.homeunix.net (31.Red-79-155-158.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [79.155.158.31]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x62sm5457644weq.15.2010.10.12.11.03.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:03:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=newton.homeunix.net ident=jao) by newton.homeunix.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P5jC2-0004fx-SJ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 20:03:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Andy Wingo's message of "Tue, 12 Oct 2010 19:46:09 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Attribution: jao X-URL: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11040 Archived-At: On Tue, Oct 12 2010, Andy Wingo wrote: > On Tue 12 Oct 2010 14:12, "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" writes: > >> "No Geiser REPL for this buffer (try M-x run-geiser)" > > Yes, I get this at times. But why tell me what to do? Why not do it for > me, with my permission? A single keypress keeps you in flow. Because perhaps you don't want to do it, and keep asking would be annoying. So it'd have to remember not to ask again, and then, if after 10 warnings you decide you want to do it, you'll have to do it anyway. But if you're sure you don't want it, perhaps you'll want to deactivate the warnings... and that's all state that is associated with buffers and will have to be inherited for buffers visiting the same file, or perhaps not (let's put there another option); and then the state will get stale and newbies will get confused, and have to read the manual two or three times to understand all the available options. Typing 'M-x run-geiser' (or binding that to a function key) once before you start hacking scheme keeps you in flow for the rest of your emacs instance life much more simply... :)