From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: bound identifiers Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:30:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87y5t7gr9f.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87d3ajibga.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1326756620 18525 80.91.229.12 (16 Jan 2012 23:30:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:30:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Stefan Israelsson Tampe Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 17 00:30:16 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rmw0F-00064S-0b for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:30:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54126 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rmw0E-0004ee-Bt for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:30:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41257) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rmw0B-0004eY-5p for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:30:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rmw0A-0006W7-22 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:30:11 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:53764 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rmw09-0006W3-Tm for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:30:10 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD408453; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:30:09 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=MZhaHynrV9IzZ58YW7dJLAlDpIY=; b=R5Wiu2 CYnaSqatvGTFJFaAedWanYqmlRuQIY0Z3aHfGLBzCcm/vIeHdaOu1b0L6WOPei9+ 6zz97xY0YujFRAdW/04Jhwy9om9c/Tp6uOvQgkpfNWe+22ChLJjmoxn7zEREkPY5 djUy0v+e77LBRbKrtpM7CCbCdYnDMRNlW3gf0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=o112mZ92WtFFUrDBKzF6CO//9oji8EjQ RCwYJaXGsWXmk9hY7D0rZ28F2DYYPz5m8g4ASmjG8vigsFf75eg52+xQ5dFb1p/3 aQg5rbatjWhPipuObIjzLXS7o8Tnv8ANr0i3VRSfzqvVquiorIYOHOmBWwI2yrzO CPsQyu5ecDw= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C878452; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:30:09 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EECD48450; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:30:07 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Israelsson Tampe's message of "Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:56:44 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 06D01BBE-409A-11E1-920A-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:13551 Archived-At: On Mon 16 Jan 2012 22:56, Stefan Israelsson Tampe writes: > As you see, it's just wild west to get the racket code working. :) Can you give a stripped-down test case for this particular behavior? That code is paged into my and Mark's minds right now :) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/