From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: add-relative-load-path ? Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:41:39 +0100 Message-ID: <87y5svh5vg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zkdycjl6.fsf@pobox.com> <87boq6q7jq.fsf@neil-laptop.ossau.uklinux.net> <87zkdiq851.fsf@pobox.com> <87r4yssl1p.fsf@neil-laptop.ossau.uklinux.net> <87y5sypvre.fsf@pobox.com> <87wr8ia0dz.fsf@gnu.org> <87pqeao0g0.fsf@pobox.com> <8739b4nebd.fsf@gnu.org> <87hazjc0rd.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327524407 7526 80.91.229.12 (25 Jan 2012 20:46:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 25 21:46:43 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rq9jv-0002sO-Lp for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:46:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49868 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rq9f8-0001Qf-TW for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:41:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35500) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rq9f6-0001QZ-1c for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:41:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rq9f5-0006oP-2B for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:41:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.82]:27883) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rq9f4-0006oJ-ML for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:41:42 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,570,1320620400"; d="scan'208";a="141433360" Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr (HELO pluto) ([80.67.176.83]) by mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 25 Jan 2012 21:41:40 +0100 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 6 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pluvi=F4se?= an 220 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <87hazjc0rd.fsf@pobox.com> (Andy Wingo's message of "Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:31:02 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 192.134.164.82 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:13679 Archived-At: Hi, Andy Wingo skribis: > On Wed 25 Jan 2012 13:42, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >> Andy Wingo skribis: >> >>>> What about calling it =E2=80=98current-file-name=E2=80=99 instead? >>> >>> > (apropos "filename") >>> (guile): set-module-filename! # >>> (guile): module-filename # >>> (guile): current-filename >>> (guile): set-port-filename! # >>> (guile): port-filename # >>> (ice-9 readline): filename-completion-function # >>> > (apropos "file-name") >>> >=20 >>> >>> Though I am responsible for three of those, I think I was just following >>> established convention. >> >> Hmm, OK then. > > We can still change it if it's the right thing, but we would probably > need to do the same with the other interfaces (with the deprecation > dance). Right. Or we could keep both, for those that already existed? (Just like some software packages have both =E2=80=9Ccolor=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9C= colour=E2=80=9D in their API.) > Note that there's also the instance of 'filename in alists, like in > source properties. We probably wouldn't be able to change those. Yes, this one cannot be changed. Ludo=E2=80=99.