Linus Björnstam <linus.bjornstam@fastmail.se> writes:

> are bound in letrec*. This should also be the case in chez, but chez
> displays an error. Given I have found the chez is never wrong with
> regards to R6RS we can say that guiles behaviour is not conformant
> with r6rs.
…
> What I am saying is: congrats, you found a bug :)

☺

> Sorry about confusing you. I was never really sure about letrec*
> behaviour, but you nerdsniped me and I spent some time reading the
> "fixing letrec (reloaded)" paper, and now things are more clear.

I guess "sorry"? Or rather "you’re welcome"? :-)

I guess the next step would be to report a bug …

Best wishes,
Arne
-- 
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
draketo.de