From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: No way out. Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:59:28 +0000 Message-ID: <87wthpkyan.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <200511301616.22258.bkorb@gnu.org> <87lkz5mysf.fsf@zip.com.au> <200512042008.00333.bkorb@gnu.org> <87psobp4mz.fsf@zip.com.au> <43956ED9.2070909@xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1135789578 21293 80.91.229.2 (28 Dec 2005 17:06:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:06:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 28 18:06:16 2005 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ereke-0007cC-Pl for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:06:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Erelx-0003QR-Ra for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:07:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ErdlC-0006Jj-U0 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:02:43 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ErdlB-0006Iz-AR for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:02:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ErdlA-0006IK-AN for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:02:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.84.72.33] (helo=mail3.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ErdlM-0000fp-5S for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:02:52 -0500 Original-Received: from laruns (host86-129-132-201.range86-129.btcentralplus.com [86.129.132.201]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7620040A04D; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from laruns (laruns [127.0.0.1]) by laruns (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C786F717; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:59:28 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: Han-Wen Nienhuys In-Reply-To: <43956ED9.2070909@xs4all.nl> (Han-Wen Nienhuys's message of "Tue, 06 Dec 2005 11:58:33 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5555 Archived-At: Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > Backtraces haven't been appearing since I started using 1.7, for over a year Because of my interest in Guile's debugging infrastructure, I'd like to understand and fix this. Your statement is a bit vague, though, unless you mean _only_ the following. > See also, > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2005-05/msg00010.html As http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2005-05/msg00019.html already asked (and to which there appears to be no reply), were you running with the debugging evaluator (in other words (debug-enable 'debug))? If not, does it help to say (debug-enable 'debug) as well as (debug-enable 'backtrace)? Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel