From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Unbuffered socket I/O Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:36:53 +0000 Message-ID: <87wt28h56i.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87mz34ol6r.fsf@laas.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172270231 9453 80.91.229.12 (23 Feb 2007 22:37:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:37:11 +0000 (UTC) To: Guile-Devel Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 23 23:37:05 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HKj2G-0000w7-Fq for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:37:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HKj2G-0004bf-2H for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:37:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HKj2B-0004bF-JX for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:36:59 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HKj2A-0004au-GU for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:36:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HKj2A-0004aj-72 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:36:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HKj29-0007Ps-Bl for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:36:57 -0500 Original-Received: from laruns (host217-43-47-35.range217-43.btcentralplus.com [217.43.47.35]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A76240A15F for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:36:56 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from laruns (laruns [127.0.0.1]) by laruns (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA386F70D for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:36:54 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: <87mz34ol6r.fsf@laas.fr> ( =?iso-8859-1?q?Ludovic_Court=E8s's_message_of?= "Fri, 23 Feb 2007 18:09:16 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6550 Archived-At: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > Hi, > > Is there a reason why `SCM_SOCK_FD_TO_PORT ()' in `socket.c' asks for an > unbuffered port? This results in awful inefficiency, as can be seen > with `strace': I don't know the details, but I recall people in the past talking about Guile doing its own buffering. Does that help at all? Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel