From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: fmatch Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 23:03:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87wruvbqen.fsf@gnu.org> References: <201005062239.32992.stefan.tampe@spray.se> <201005092252.01307.stefan.tampe@spray.se> <87aas817si.fsf@gnu.org> <201005172208.00094.stefan.tampe@spray.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274562223 29186 80.91.229.12 (22 May 2010 21:03:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 21:03:43 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 22 23:03:41 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFvr7-000733-Ga for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 23:03:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36385 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFvr7-00044C-35 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 17:03:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38036 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFvqy-00043w-5H for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 17:03:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFvqw-0003kp-2v for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 17:03:27 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:43739) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFvqv-0003kR-Ov for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 17:03:26 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFvqt-0006v3-Tz for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 23:03:23 +0200 Original-Received: from acces.bordeaux.inria.fr ([193.50.110.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 22 May 2010 23:03:23 +0200 Original-Received: from ludo by acces.bordeaux.inria.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 22 May 2010 23:03:23 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ connect(): No such file or directory Original-Lines: 28 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: acces.bordeaux.inria.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 3 Prairial an 218 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:wdt9z8rHZCbREuOs0JXTp4uOE00= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10345 Archived-At: Hi! stefan writes: > Shall we say that we use the slightly modified version of (ice-9 match) that > ypu dug up for now! Hmm, yes? Please send an actual patch against Guile master, so we have something concrete do discuss. :-) Can you make sure to isolate Guile-specific changes, ideally in a way that allows us to include upstream files (match.scm itself and test cases) unmodified? See the sxml and lalr modules for examples. > On a side note I have not gotten any answer from the author of that code > that I modified. Hmm that’s unfortunate. If we can’t get record-matching included upstream shortly, then I’d suggest making the addition of record-matching a separate commit in our repository, so we can easily find it in the future. Could you do that? Thanks! Ludo’.