* scm_is_exact, scm_is_inexact
@ 2011-10-09 16:16 Mike Gran
2011-10-09 20:37 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mike Gran @ 2011-10-09 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guile-devel
Hi-
Would it be okay for me to add scm_is_exact and scm_is_inexact
C functions as companions to the existing scm_exact_p and
scm_inexact_p?
If so, which branch?
-Mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: scm_is_exact, scm_is_inexact
2011-10-09 16:16 scm_is_exact, scm_is_inexact Mike Gran
@ 2011-10-09 20:37 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2011-10-09 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guile-devel
Hi Mike,
Mike Gran <spk121@yahoo.com> skribis:
> Would it be okay for me to add scm_is_exact and scm_is_inexact
> C functions as companions to the existing scm_exact_p and
>
> scm_inexact_p?
Yes.
> If so, which branch?
2.0 is OK.
Thanks, and thanks for the doc patch you committed too!
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-09 20:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-09 16:16 scm_is_exact, scm_is_inexact Mike Gran
2011-10-09 20:37 ` Ludovic Courtès
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).