From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Compiler Branch Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:47:46 +0100 Message-ID: <87wra0c0y5.fsf@pobox.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1323766090 21650 80.91.229.12 (13 Dec 2011 08:48:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:48:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Noah Lavine Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 13 09:48:02 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RaO1q-0006Yr-0q for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:48:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36191 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RaO1p-0001sW-HC for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 03:48:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48761) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RaO1m-0001s4-61 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 03:47:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RaO1f-0007FV-In for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 03:47:58 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:52085 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RaO1f-0007FJ-GN for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 03:47:51 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC184674B; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 03:47:50 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=mxmdwH1m3hxfzP5thcXOTqg8qVU=; b=GKAT91 X/1ZBv2ScH9hPQRGs+m5p3F65MrBg5cuB03OCRIjGrheAxNgide551p9WIKx+8jH MhhsS4bCcZRrVixj1z6agwNcpJvjX8lHw31YF/Y+/LG07E3mDLRxtWvz9HJKUr84 7Ev67tEuB1ze7QmMUzvemdm1wbTuxu8Er/PoI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=EWtDtWPOI0FGWCmNCgouQHh0zfBy/VLP r3iekb2DqjTQ6ijz06C0UsVeq32VocrRAOCimcH0BUNgSOgirOorBRH/j50uSA1V s60NGniRLBfDAwh2O610trKNAjZZ4dXyKFHUQ/T2D4YahAK0I/jmQIxGnvCQO5JN LhMuf+EwLf0= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64E3674A; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 03:47:50 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 159806749; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 03:47:49 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Noah Lavine's message of "Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:39:15 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 235D16FE-2567-11E1-8F10-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:13046 Archived-At: On Tue 13 Dec 2011 05:39, Noah Lavine writes: > Following up on my last email, I am nervously announcing a new branch, > 'wip-compiler'. I hope that in a few months this branch will contain a > working compiler. For now, it contains a few new data structures and a > function that converts Tree-IL to a form that will be nicer for > analysis. Cool. As a quick reaction, I have some doubts about this project. But, I guess a WIP branch would be a good thing to have, and it would make the discussion more concrete. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/