From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Do we have a guile-1.8 branch? Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 21:18:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87wr4dl0bk.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87vckf8ow1.fsf@gnuvola.org> <20120501235714.GOXX4.139112.root@cdptpa-web34-z02.mail.rr.com> <87bom6dz5j.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1337109551 24760 80.91.229.3 (15 May 2012 19:19:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 19:19:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Noah Lavine Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 15 21:19:08 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SUNH2-00023N-N2 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 21:19:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60481 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUNH2-0000EL-32 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 15:19:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47079) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUNGy-0000CO-8C for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 15:19:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUNGw-0000sP-8z for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2012 15:19:03 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:59657 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SUNGw-0000rx-0F; Tue, 15 May 2012 15:19:02 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D86A142; Tue, 15 May 2012 15:18:59 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=BYjxPUsce/PB KN94n/2p9u2urTw=; b=WbEAHCnU0gWNMb6G7YbPXYHZzC/m8kxI05ALm6TO4yg2 rC4jhZWn2gmHo+TqWvd50/fU662O9b+1XerPXM3eoI1K7SKCszmcI0vR0S/jiNEx KFw3PNOE6cTkJ/5OBvNzRMCwt4DPca7+Ophh+zSLJp883NUzxGP19IXzDOKvFBA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ds8IBG a2wTWFSJL0FB0jgqAsrHKRydnBBYuhAIQo93ExYXSvL7PgKz3mTI5uFOgWb1lCTI Xr6/D6lRPxjasKDhUPpEp8J+FlW2Ff0kN+8cwHJKnGxHh/T73R8s4xwRQuvQjw37 vSxoLsdlfcYKKrxLJGgAtR+7pQSIV4daBSUU4= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1B7A141; Tue, 15 May 2012 15:18:59 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75A47A140; Tue, 15 May 2012 15:18:58 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Noah Lavine's message of "Wed, 2 May 2012 18:04:16 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D24458A6-9EC2-11E1-9A8E-E981AF15ED39-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:14444 Archived-At: On Thu 03 May 2012 00:04, Noah Lavine writes: >> Yes, please remove the =E2=80=98release-1.8=E2=80=99 branch. >> >> Something like =E2=80=98git push origin :release-1.8=E2=80=99 should wor= k (search for >> =E2=80=9Cdelete=E2=80=9D in git-push(1).) >> >> Thanks, >> Ludo=E2=80=99. > > Oh, I never knew how to do that. It's done now. Cool. It's pretty strange, sometimes if I want to rebase a WIP branch and push a new one, I have to first delete the old one, then push the new one, instead of sending a forced update (i.e. instead of git push origin +wip-foo). Strange things :) Cheers, Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/