From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [FEATURE] List all available languages Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 11:21:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87wquz7wp4.fsf@pobox.com> References: <1358940518.3676.5.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> <1359107760.3676.28.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> <1359110632.3676.30.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> <878v7hcyj6.fsf@pobox.com> <87ehh9m3ij.fsf@tines.lan> <87a9rwnagt.fsf@tines.lan> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1359282120 23824 80.91.229.3 (27 Jan 2013 10:22:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 10:22:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 27 11:22:19 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TzPNQ-0006uR-7u for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 11:22:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49884 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TzPN8-0005ca-Dh for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 05:21:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33958) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TzPMz-0005cI-M8 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 05:21:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TzPMx-0003Im-Ew for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 05:21:49 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:52860 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TzPMx-0003If-BA for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 05:21:47 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D592AC22; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 05:21:47 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=u3jE9rqKxK7sHLvcifGhwXxmj+s=; b=h3jG0f y5LZ9M/sK+2qSL81ErAse5QgfYpudbUzTdEB3m90FN0+XJ665+Lc53sr5Zj2wUqe wyJNnNf2ZRID9AaX0vT8ailM5QCI8uypa7tYkglOAowYdF/bsdr5Tnb1rARmHVZr zETKWXYDxMesI+8NQSqz6cfYJmvoKh/DC6TEg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=NcFK9p/pofd5koHpeyEa+XOl2a2OqnPS UBNxN18s5hY0BDglqgQ5sQo0puGXm7+utC+A+00WjFpWl3Qz+e4kmk8WboJicX5M 1PtnuQrDzJVavMdbVSt4z7U2ivKtnAtT1C90Vwqf0h5P4UyVJMFhTzMcsUjmBUMo AOdg5q1lmmg= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068D8AC21; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 05:21:47 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D687AC20; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 05:21:46 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87a9rwnagt.fsf@tines.lan> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:50:42 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 5AB4445E-686B-11E2-970B-0A4F0E5B5709-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 208.72.237.25 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:15600 Archived-At: On Fri 25 Jan 2013 23:50, Mark H Weaver writes: > I wrote: >> How about adding a new boolean field to that marks it as >> "internal" or something to that effect? We could have it default to #f >> for backward compatibility, and mark our internal languages as #t. > > I've attached a proposed patch to add this field. Thoughts? LGTM, though I would call it something else -- because these languages are internal but not internal only. Other possibilities: "internal", "for-humans", ... Andy -- http://wingolog.org/