From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark H Weaver Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: The 2.0.9 VM cores in enqueue (threads.c:309) -- partial fix, patch attached Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:00:17 -0400 Message-ID: <87wqpsd0la.fsf@tines.lan> References: <517C2DBF.7050304@computer.org> <517E1990.3090302@computer.org> <87sj29zlza.fsf@tines.lan> <51BEDF92.2050309@computer.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371495638 15514 80.91.229.3 (17 Jun 2013 19:00:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:00:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Andrew Gaylard Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 17 21:00:38 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UoefN-0007lF-SB for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:00:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41275 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoefN-0001nw-Ha for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:00:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43169) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoefJ-0001jv-Ro for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:00:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoefI-0005wF-ON for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:00:33 -0400 Original-Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:33972) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoefI-0005w7-JD for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:00:32 -0400 Original-Received: from 209-6-92-20.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.92.20] helo=tines.lan) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UoefB-0008QQ-C4; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:00:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <51BEDF92.2050309@computer.org> (Andrew Gaylard's message of "Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:06:10 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 96.39.62.75 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:16494 Archived-At: Hi Andrew, Andrew Gaylard writes: > Inspection of the remqueue function shows > that the logic is not correct when removing the last entry in the queue. Indeed, thanks very much for debugging this! I pushed a fix to stable-2.0. > However it now hangs somewhere else (which may be an unrelated problem). Well, that's progress at least. Please let us know what you find. Thanks, Mark